Societies, like mine, which have never broken with a feudal past require publicly-funded bureaucracies (ideally quaint and in practice somewhat incompetent) to keep track of entitlements to names, titles, forms of address, coats of arms, and order of precedence. Much information on these subjects has been and still is published in large volumes - Burke’s and Debrett’s the best known - which could once be found in all aristocratic households and which were also indispensable to collectors of autographs, coats of arms, and letter seals. Wikipedia is heavily indebted to these traditional sources.
This
1830 letter is signed off by an interesting and energetic character, Sir George
Nayler (1764 – 1831), who started life as the fifth son of a provincial
surgeon, became a painter of miniatures, married the illegitimate daughter of a
baronet, and bought his way into the genealogical
bureaucracies (among other titles he purchased those of Blanc Coursier
Herald and Bluemantle Poursuivant), rising to become Garter Principal
King of Arms in 1822. He was knighted in 1813.
A year on from the date of this letter, the recipient Sir Henry Bedingfeld Bart was indeed licensed to use the name and arms of Paston-Bedingfeld. His life was undistinguished
except for the fact that the passage of the Catholic Relief Act in 1829 no
doubt made it easier for him to become a Justice of the Peace and Deputy Lieutenant
of Norfolk in 1831. His eldest son Henry, born in 1830, succeeded to the title;
he was sent to the Jesuit boarding school which still has the appropriate name of
Stonyhurst – on this site you can find an 1843 letter written by the young
Henry to his mother recording his misery:
https://www.otherpeoplesletters.com/2026/07/henry-bedingfeld-very-unhappy-pupil-of.html
Transcription
Addressed
to: Sir Henry Richard Bedingfeld Bart &c &c &c Oxburgh Hall
Stoke Ferry Norfolk
Datelined:
17 Hanover Square London 24 Feby 1830
Faded
London postmarks, one indicating pre-payment of the letter
Sir
A
Petition signed by Lady Bedingfeld and yourself praying the Royal Licence to be
allowed to take the name and Arms of Paston having been in the usual course
referred by the Right Honble Mr Secretary Peel for my Report thereon, I trust that
after the Correspondence I had the honour to have with you, and Lady
Bedingfeld, your Mother, on the same subject during your Residence at Ghent,
and your subsequently calling upon me with your Brother-in-law Mr Molyneux-Seel
relative to the same, you will excuse my expressing my surprize at now finding
the business placed n the hands of another Member of the Heralds College. It
occurred to me that there must have been some mistake, and that the application
was intended to have been made to me, and this idea is confirmed by a Letter
from my Friend Mr Molyneux-Seel in which he says “If measures have been taken
respecting the Licence I feel satisfied that there must have been some mistake
in that application not having been made through you”
Under
these circumstances I have presumed to trouble you with this Letter, in the
hope that you will do me the favour to inform me, whether application was
intended to have been made to me, upon this occasion, or whether any
Circumstances have arisen to induce you to place this business in other hands,
after I had so long since been consulted on the subject, and had prepared and
transmitted to you a Petition to His Majesty praying for the same object.
I
feel assured that Your Goodness will pardon the trouble I am thus giving you,
and I have the Honour to remain, Sir,
Your
most Obedient and most faithful Servant
Geo.
Nayler, Garter
[The
letter has been written by or dictated to a clerk and Nayler has appended his signature
using a different pen]
References
Wikipedia:
Sir Henry Paston-Bedingfeld, 6th Baronet
Wikipedia:
George Nayler
Wikipedia:
Garter Principal King of Arms

No comments:
Post a Comment